Asset rights and segregation
Verify title, cash flows, security interests and insolvency segregation, and define the legal rights held by token holders.
The hard part of an RWA or crypto fund is not recording an asset or fund interest on-chain. It is aligning asset rights, fund structure, management, custody, offering and exit in one workable legal and operating path.
Mankun advises on digital-asset investment, cross-border structures, product issuance and ongoing compliance.We start with investors, underlying assets, funds flow and token rights, then determine the appropriate fund form, regulatory permissions, distribution, custody and exit arrangements.
An RWA or crypto fund is not a single-licence business. Start by identifying the rights investors actually receive, then map management, offering, trading and asset custody to the applicable rules.Tokenisation often changes record-keeping and transfer mechanics; it does not automatically change the legal character of the underlying financial instrument.
Verify title, cash flows, security interests and insolvency segregation, and define the legal rights held by token holders.
Separate fund registration from investment management and delegated authority; a vehicle is not the same as an operating permission.
Assess documents, restrictions and suitability based on investor type, offering location, channels and public or private status.
Align on-chain and off-chain records, custody of keys and assets, valuation, liquidity, redemption and secondary transfers.
From commercial objectives and asset rights through fund formation, offering and exit, we turn legal analysis into documents and operating actions.
A limited partnership fund is an optional fund vehicle, not an automatic authorisation for management, distribution or public offering. The correct path depends on the activities, assets, investors and offering method.
A Hong Kong limited partnership fund is an opt-in private fund vehicle. Management, offering and regulated activities must still be assessed separately.
Tokenisation commonly records traditional rights on a programmable platform. The underlying instrument's securities-law character and requirements remain relevant.
Virtual-asset investment objectives, exposure and management authority affect licensing and additional-condition analysis.
Investor type, channel, knowledge, suitability, execution and custody arrangements all affect the path.
Title, NAV, on-chain and off-chain records, keys and bank accounts need to reconcile, with clear exception handling.
Documents should explain liquidity limits, lock-ups, suspension, secondary transfers and asset distribution on termination.
Lawyers combining Hong Kong fund, Web3, RWA and cross-border structuring experience.

An Australian-admitted lawyer with experience in international law, cross-border compliance and fintech services.
View profile →
Focuses on Web3 research and legal services, with full-cycle support for blockchain companies.
View profile →
Equity Partner at Man Kun Law Firm (Shenzhen). LL.M. in International Business Law from the National University of Singapore, with over a decade of legal and compliance experience spanning capital markets, cross-border investment, industrial funds and enterprise management.
View profile →Practical guides on fund structures, licensing and RWA legal paths.

Compare Cayman SPC and ELP, BVI Approved Funds, Singapore VCC, Hong Kong LPF and OFC structures.
Read article →
Follow the formation, Type 9 licensing, professional-investor, custody and operating decisions.
Read article →
Understand the legal entity, manager, custodian, investor rights and operating documents.
Read article →
Map Types 1, 4 and 9 to distribution, investment advice and asset-management activities.
Read article →
Assess asset title, token-holder rights, offering, transfer, custody and regulatory classification.
Read article →These answers identify the next facts a project should verify. The conclusion still depends on jurisdiction, investors and the actual funds flow.
No conclusion should be drawn from LPF registration alone. The LPF is the vehicle; investment management, distribution, public offering and virtual-asset activities require separate analysis.
First identify who actually exercises investment management in Hong Kong, whether that activity is regulated and how the strategy and virtual-asset exposure are structured. The fund label alone is not enough.
Usually not. The SFC's approach to tokenised securities starts with the underlying instrument's legal character and also addresses tokenisation, technology and transfer risks.
Before fixing token rights, offering documents or token mechanics. Unclear title, cash flow, encumbrances or enforceability will be amplified rather than solved by tokenisation.
Professional-investor status may affect offering restrictions, but it does not automatically remove management, distribution, suitability, AML, custody and disclosure questions.
Prepare one map showing investors, underlying assets, participants, funds flow, token rights and exit. Use it to test the structure, permissions and documents.
Tell us about the underlying asset, intended investors, offering locations and product flow. We will help identify the structural and regulatory forks first.