Recently, Mankun Law FirmAttorney Mao Jiehao’s teamsuccessfully representeda crypto mining rig investment dispute. The case experiencedan unfavorable situation where claims were dismissed at both the first and second instances, but was ultimately reversed in a retrial by the Provincial Higher People's Court, which upheld our client’s claims andrecovered significant investment losses for the client。
In this case, the investor committed substantial funds to participate in a crypto mining rig project but failed to obtain the agreed-upon returns or repayment of principal. The courts of first and second instance dismissed the claims on the grounds that“the relevant investment activities involved virtual currencies, and thus the losses should be borne by the investor”, leaving the case at an impasse.
Mankun Law FirmAttorney Mao Jiehao’s teamserved as counsel from the first instance onward, persistently advocating with strong legal arguments. During the retrial phase, the team presented compelling arguments and breakthrough strategies. Ultimately, the Provincial Higher People's Court accepted our position,issued areversal of judgment, thereby safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the investor.
This case fully demonstrates the professional competence and sense of responsibility of Mankun Law Firm and Attorney Mao Jiehao’s team in providing legal services in crypto investment disputes andWeb3related fields.Mankun attorneys have long specialized in blockchain, crypto assets, and Web3 compliance, accumulating extensive litigation experience and industry insight. We will continue to uphold the principle of“Professionalism and Diligence”, striving to secure maximum protection of our clients’ rights and interests.
If you are facinglegal disputes related to digital currency, virtual currency investments, mining disputes, or other Web3-related areas, Attorney Mao Jiehao’s team at Mankun Law Firm is ready to provide robust legal support leveraging our extensive practical experience and dedicated service attitude.
The redacted judgment is displayed below:
